The $30 Billion Insult: LAX Is Spending Billions to Fix the Wrong Problem

Los Angeles is in the midst of the largest public works project in its history — and its flagship solution for LAX gridlock is destined to fail. The problem isn't a lack of roads. It's a lack of pricing. LAWA is giving away its most valuable asset — terminal curb space — for free, then spending billions to manage the predictable chaos. This is the economic case for doing it differently, before the world's cameras roll into Los Angeles for the 2028 Olympics.

By Andrew Sachs, PTMP March 8, 2026 8 MIN READ
LAX Central Terminal Area — the gridlock horseshoe

$30B

Total Capital Program

$5.5B

LAMP / Mobility Hubs

$1.9B

New Flyovers & Ramps

The Horseshoe of Insanity

We have all felt it. It’s an existential dread unique to Los Angeles, a slow-motion paralysis that begins the moment you exit the 405. It’s the Los Angeles Airport (LAX) Central Terminal Area (CTA) — a 1.5-mile, U-shaped purgatory known simply as “the horseshoe.” It’s the “kiss-and-fly” drop-off that turns into a 45-minute hostage situation. It’s the “quick” pickup that becomes an hour-long odyssey of looping the terminals, your eyes darting between the gridlocked traffic and the texts from your passenger, who is now, somehow, at a different terminal.

This daily chaos is the shared pain of millions. And here is the $30 billion insult: Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA) is in the midst of the largest public works project in the city’s history, and its flagship “solution” for traffic is destined to fail.

The problem is not a lack of roads. The problem is a lack of pricing.

The gridlock at LAX highlights a fundamental economic failure — a classic “tragedy of the commons” from the 1950s unfolding in real time. LAWA is giving away its most scarce, valuable, and congested resource — terminal curb space — for free. Because it’s free, it is overused to the point of breakdown. In response, LAWA is spending between $1.5 billion and $1.9 billion on a network of new flyovers and ramps to “manage” this traffic. This is the great misdirection.

LAX Gridlock — the CTA horseshoe
The CTA Horseshoe — where billions of dollars in vehicles go to circle endlessly, for free

The $1.9 Billion Miscalculation

If you’ve driven near LAX recently, you’ve seen the monolithic concrete pillars rising from the earth. This is the Airfield and Terminal Modernization Program (ATMP), a $1.5 to $1.9 billion project to build 4.4 miles of new elevated roadways, bridges, and flyovers. The stated goal is to “better manage traffic” by separating airport-bound vehicles from the local traffic perpetually choking Sepulveda Boulevard.

This is the 21st-century equivalent of widening the 405 Freeway — and it will have the same result. It is a textbook case of “induced demand.” A growing chorus of residents, transportation advocates, and experts has been screaming this from the sidelines, telling commissioners directly that the project “won’t work.” These new flyovers are just a more efficient, multi-billion-dollar vehicular funnel. They will dump more cars, more quickly, into the same saturated, unpriced, and chaotic terminal curbs.

The gridlock isn’t a mysterious force of nature. It is the direct, predictable result of two human behaviors — both perfectly rational responses to a flawed economic system:

Looping — endless, zero-cost circling of drivers waiting for a passenger. You’re 15 minutes early, so you enter the horseshoe and just keep driving, sometimes for an hour, because it costs you nothing.

Curb-Squatting — TNCs, limos, and private cars idling at the curb, creating a wall of vehicles that blocks all flow. They do it because the risk of a ticket is low and the cost of idling is zero.

These are not bad drivers. They are rational economic actors responding to a flawed system. When a resource is free, it is overused to the point of collapse.

How the horseshoe jams

A free curb rewards the two behaviors that break it

CTA GARAGES empty spaces, a short walk away TERMINALS LOOPINGfree, so why not CURB-SQUATTING idling carsblock the lane IN OUT back around, at no cost, as many times as you like
The red car is 15 minutes early.Laps 0Time circling 0:00Cost to circle $0.00

Looping and curb-squatting are not bad driving. They are the rational response to a curb that costs nothing to occupy, and every circling car is one more car in the queue for the curb.

Parkonomics schematic, not to scale. Timer is illustrative.

The Sleeping Giant: LA’s $5.5 Billion “Unactivated” Solution

Here is the exquisite irony: while LAWA’s left hand is building a road to nowhere, its right hand has already built a masterpiece. The Landside Access Modernization Program (LAMP) is not just a train; it is a fully integrated, state-of-the-art central piece of a mobility hub specifically designed to move the vast majority of pick-ups and drop-offs out of the Central Terminal Area.

Where the money is going

LA already bought the fix for $5.5 billion. Then it approved up to $1.9 billion more for roads that feed the old curb.

$5.5BLAMP: the people mover, mobility hubs and rental car center. The solution, built and waiting.
$1.9BNew flyovers and ramps: 4.4 miles of roadway feeding the same unpriced curb.
$22.6BThe rest of the roughly $30 billion capital program.

Figures as cited in this article. Road program shown at the top of its $1.5 to $1.9 billion range.

Its spine is the Automated People Mover (APM) — a 2.25-mile, fully-electric elevated train with six stations, running 24/7, with trains every two minutes, capable of moving 10,000 passengers per hour. This spine connects to purpose-built hubs: the ITF-East as the new “front door” for private traffic connecting to the regional rail system; the ITF-West as the permanent, high-tech hub for TNCs and taxis; and the ConRAC Facility, expected to eliminate more than 3,200 daily shuttle bus trips from the airport loop alone.

The sleeping giant

The people mover: the spine of a $5.5 billion system that already sorts every kind of trip

CENTRAL TERMINAL AREA THE FREE HUBS West CTAterminalsCenter CTAterminalsEast CTAterminalsITF-WestUber, Lyft, taxisITF-Eastdrop-off, Metro C and KConRACrental cars Drive to a hub for free, ride free to your terminal. The curb becomes optional.
2.25 mipeople mover line
6stations
2 minbetween trains
10,000riders per hour
24/7fully electric

The engineering already sorts private cars, ride-hail and rental cars into their own hubs. What it lacks is a reason for drivers to use them instead of the curb.

Parkonomics schematic, not to scale. System figures as cited in this article.

The new infrastructure enables the solution, but it doesn’t incentivize it. It is a $5.5 billion “on” switch that no one has a mandate to flip.

LAWA has developed a $5.5 billion solution that, as it currently stands, relies on little more than hope to activate. The policy assumes that millions of Angelenos, trained by a car-centric culture, will voluntarily choose a new multi-step process over the “one-seat” ride to the curb they’ve used for 60 years. This assumption is dangerously, breathtakingly naive.

The Parkonomics 2.0 Solution: The Brain for the $30 Billion Body

Our “Parkonomics” model is the economic brain that instantly activates the new infrastructure. It’s a non-punitive, 3-tiered system that gives passengers clear, rational choices — and gives politically risk-averse officials the cover they need to flip the $5.5 billion switch.

Option 1

Free

Drive to ITF-East (private vehicles) or ITF-West (TNCs/taxis). Ride the APM to the terminals — a time-guaranteed 2-minute journey. Zero cost.

$0.00 — Mobility Hubs

Option 2

Premium

Drive any vehicle directly to the CTA horseshoe. A convenience fee for a luxury good: curb access. Not a tax — a premium service.

$5 entry + $5 / 15 min

Option 3

Smart

Pay the $5 CTA access fee, but park in a CTA garage. The $5 covers 30 minutes of garage parking — cheaper than circling the horseshoe.

$5 entry = 30 min garage
Parkonomics 2.0 Solution — Free, Premium, Smart options
Parkonomics 2.0: The 3-tier access model that activates the $5.5B LAMP investment

This pricing model is a finely tuned machine for eliminating inefficient behavior. Looping is instantly killed — why would any rational person circle for 45 minutes and pay $15 when they can wait at the free cell phone lot or park in the garage for less? Curb-Squatting is instantly killed — the TNC driver now faces an escalating $5 penalty for every 15 minutes they idle at the curb. The garages become “waiting rooms,” moving thousands of stationary vehicles from flow lanes into storage and clearing the horseshoe for its only intended purpose: active loading and unloading.

Try the numbers

What would your pickup cost under the three-tier plan?

Always free

Free: the hub

$0

Wait at ITF-East or ITF-West, meet your passenger off the people mover.

Priciest

Premium: the curb

$10

$5 to enter the horseshoe for 15 minutes, then $5 for every 15 minutes after.

Best way to wait

Smart: the garage

$5

The same $5 entry covers 30 minutes in a CTA garage, then $3 per 15 minutes.

Today, circling for 20 minutes costs $0. That is the whole problem.

Rates are the proposal in this article, rounded up to the next 15-minute block. Illustrative, not LAWA policy.

Debunking the Excuses of the Unimaginative

Critics will warn of logistical nightmares, regulatory hurdles, and unprecedented complexity. We reject that cynicism. The technology required — Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR/LPR) — is not novel. It is the same technology already operational in California’s Express Toll Lanes in Orange County and the HOT lanes in San Diego.

The claim that “no other US airport does this” is demonstrably false. The primary precedent is Dallas/Fort Worth (DFW) — a massive hub in a car-loving state — which already charges all vehicles for terminal access. London Heathrow implemented a Terminal Drop-Off Charge for the explicit purpose of reducing congestion. New York’s JFK and Newark already charge TNCs Airport Access Fees of $1.75–$2.50 per trip.

Global Airport Access Fee Precedents
Airport Model Fee Structure Free Alternative
DFW Time-based curb access $2.00 for 8–30 min on-premises Yes
LHR (Heathrow) Terminal drop-off charge Per-visit fee, rising annually Yes
JFK / EWR TNC access fee $1.75–$2.50 per TNC trip Yes
LAX (proposed) Universal curb access fee $5 entry + $5/15 min; $0 at hubs Yes — Free APM
LAX (current) None $0.00 — free-for-all No policy

The $100 Million Motive and the Olympic Forcing Function

This policy isn’t just about traffic. It’s about financial survival. LAWA is a self-funding enterprise, and historically, its “cash cow” has been parking — contributing approximately $108 million to $125.6 million annually in Calendar Year 2019. That massive, reliable revenue stream is under direct threat from the rise of TNCs, which have cannibalized traditional parking and rental car revenue.

$125M

Annual Parking Revenue (2019)

3,200+

Daily Shuttle Trips Eliminated by ConRAC

10–15M

Olympic Ticketed Spectators Expected

The Parkonomics surcharge is the full, strategic evolution of the airport access fee idea. It intelligently shifts the “point of sale” from the parking garage to include the terminal curb — an increasingly scarce and high-value asset. The new revenue from millions of “premium” curb trips will not only supplement the $100M+ in parking revenue, it will far exceed it.

Under normal circumstances, a policy like this would suffer a death by a thousand cuts in committee. But Los Angeles has a unique, one-time, non-negotiable deadline: the 2028 Summer Olympic and Paralympic Games. The Olympics are what is known in policy as a “date certain event” — a forcing function that provides political justification to bypass business as usual. The current gridlock is not just an inconvenience. At the 2028 Olympics, it will be a global humiliation.

The forcing function

Time left before the world lands at LAX

000days
00hours
00minutes

The LA28 Olympic Games open on July 14, 2028. Ten to fifteen million ticketed spectators are expected, and the horseshoe will be their first impression of the city.

Games dates: LA28. Spectator estimate as cited in this article.

The Courage to Be Rational

The infamous gridlock at LAX is an economic problem, not just an engineering one. The current approach is trying to solve a market failure with more concrete — which is, by definition, insanity.

In 2020, the Los Angeles City Council passed a motion to study incentives for transit use. LAWA reportedly “verbally rejected” it. Their excuse? There was “No direct transit access to the airport.” That excuse is now officially, and expensively, obsolete. The entire $5.5 billion LAMP is a massive, physical verification system. LAWA’s own planners designed the infrastructure to support this precise policy.

The infrastructure is a body without a brain. The “Parkonomics” access fee is the brain.

The solution is not theoretical. It is proven, precedented, and technologically feasible. The technology exists. The precedent is set. The financial need is urgent. The 2028 Olympics provide a non-negotiable deadline. The time for studies, delays, and half-measures is over. It’s time to activate the system we’ve already built and give Angelenos the world-class, gridlock-free airport they have paid for.

Share LinkedIn Facebook X
Andrew Sachs, PTMPA
About the Author
Andrew Sachs, PTMP
Read Next
Discussion

Practitioner perspectives welcome. Comments are reviewed before publication; your email is never shown.